A heuristic use of dynamic programming to upperbound treewidth

09/17/2019
by   Hisao Tamaki, et al.
0

For a graph G, let Ω(G) denote the set of all potential maximal cliques of G. For each subset Ω of Ω(G), let (G, Ω) denote the smallest k such that there is a tree-decomposition of G of width k whose bags all belong to Ω. Bouchitté and Todinca observed in 2001 that (G, Ω(G)) is exactly the treewidth of G and developed a dynamic programming algorithm to compute it. Indeed, their algorithm can readily be applied to an arbitrary non-empty subset Ω of Ω(G) and computes (G, Ω), or reports that it is undefined, in time |Ω||V(G)|^O(1). This efficient tool for computing (G, Ω) allows us to conceive of an iterative improvement procedure for treewidth upper bounds which maintains, as the current solution, a set of potential maximal cliques rather than a tree-decomposition. We design and implement an algorithm along this approach. Experiments show that our algorithm vastly outperforms previously implemented heuristic algorithms for treewidth.

READ FULL TEXT

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset

Sign in with Google

×

Use your Google Account to sign in to DeepAI

×

Consider DeepAI Pro