Automating Defeasible Reasoning in Law

05/15/2022
by   How Khang Lim, et al.
3

The paper studies defeasible reasoning in rule-based systems, in particular about legal norms and contracts. We identify rule modifiers that specify how rules interact and how they can be overridden. We then define rule transformations that eliminate these modifiers, leading in the end to a translation of rules to formulas. For reasoning with and about rules, we contrast two approaches, one in a classical logic with SMT solvers as proof engines, one in a non-monotonic logic with Answer Set Programming solvers.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
08/30/2011

Translating Answer-Set Programs into Bit-Vector Logic

Answer set programming (ASP) is a paradigm for declarative problem solvi...
research
10/08/2020

RNNLogic: Learning Logic Rules for Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs

This paper studies learning logic rules for reasoning on knowledge graph...
research
03/27/2013

Implementing Evidential Reasoning in Expert Systems

The Dempster-Shafer theory has been extended recently for its applicatio...
research
08/10/2023

Notation3 as an Existential Rule Language

Notation3 Logic () is an extension of RDF that allows the user to write ...
research
06/16/2015

ASPMT(QS): Non-Monotonic Spatial Reasoning with Answer Set Programming Modulo Theories

The systematic modelling of dynamic spatial systems [9] is a key require...
research
03/27/2013

The Myth of Modularity in Rule-Based Systems

In this paper, we examine the concept of modularity, an often cited adva...
research
07/20/2021

Semantic Reasoning with Differentiable Graph Transformations

This paper introduces a differentiable semantic reasoner, where rules ar...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset