Can your paper evade the editors axe? Towards an AI assisted peer review system

by   Tirthankar Ghosal, et al.

This work is an exploratory study of how we could progress a step towards an AI assisted peer- review system. The proposed approach is an ambitious attempt to automate the Desk-Rejection phenomenon prevalent in academic peer review. In this investigation we first attempt to decipher the possible reasons of rejection of a scientific manuscript from the editors desk. To seek a solution to those causes, we combine a flair of information extraction techniques, clustering, citation analysis to finally formulate a supervised solution to the identified problems. The projected approach integrates two important aspects of rejection: i) a paper being rejected because of out of scope and ii) a paper rejected due to poor quality. We extract several features to quantify the quality of a paper and the degree of in-scope exploring keyword search, citation analysis, reputations of authors and affiliations, similarity with respect to accepted papers. The features are then fed to standard machine learning based classifiers to develop an automated system. On a decent set of test data our generic approach yields promising results across 3 different journals. The study inherently exhibits the possibility of a redefined interest of the research community on the study of rejected papers and inculcates a drive towards an automated peer review system.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


An AI aid to the editors. Exploring the possibility of an AI assisted article classification system

This work is a preliminary exploratory study of how we could progress a ...

Peer review and citation data in predicting university rankings, a large-scale analysis

Most Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) draw on peer revi...

Unveiling the Sentinels: Assessing AI Performance in Cybersecurity Peer Review

Peer review is the method employed by the scientific community for evalu...

Cite-seeing and Reviewing: A Study on Citation Bias in Peer Review

Citations play an important role in researchers' careers as a key factor...

Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data

In this study, we address the question whether (and to what extent, resp...

A Semi-Automated Solution Approach Selection Tool for Any Use Case via Scopus and OpenAI: a Case Study for AI/ML in Oncology

In today's vast literature landscape, a manual review is very time-consu...

Day of the week submission effect for accepted papers in Physica A, PLOS ONE, Nature and Cell

The particular day of the week when an event occurs seems to have unexpe...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset