Collective Argumentation

07/09/2002
by   Alexander Bochman, et al.
0

An extension of an abstract argumentation framework, called collective argumentation, is introduced in which the attack relation is defined directly among sets of arguments. The extension turns out to be suitable, in particular, for representing semantics of disjunctive logic programs. Two special kinds of collective argumentation are considered in which the opponents can share their arguments.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/03/2020

On Computing Stable Extensions of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks

An abstract argumentation framework (af for short) is a directed graph (...
research
03/05/2019

Bipolar in Temporal Argumentation Framework

A Timed Argumentation Framework (TAF) is a formalism where arguments are...
research
09/10/2019

A Bayesian Approach to Direct and Inverse Abstract Argumentation Problems

This paper studies a fundamental mechanism of how to detect a conflict b...
research
09/10/2020

A Note on Rich Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks

Recently, qualitative uncertainty in abstract argumentation has received...
research
07/19/2017

Argotario: Computational Argumentation Meets Serious Games

An important skill in critical thinking and argumentation is the ability...
research
08/28/2014

Equilibrium States in Numerical Argumentation Networks

Given an argumentation network with initial values to the arguments, we ...
research
06/27/2023

A novel structured argumentation framework for improved explainability of classification tasks

This paper presents a novel framework for structured argumentation, name...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset