Efficiency of Self-Adjusting Heaps
share
Since the invention of the pairing heap by Fredman et al., it has been an open question whether this or any other simple "self-adjusting" heap supports decrease-key operations on n-item heaps in O(loglog n) time. Using powerful new techniques, we answer this question in the affirmative. We prove that both slim and smooth heaps, recently introduced self-adjusting heaps, support heap operations on an n-item heap in the following amortized time bounds: O(log n) for delete-min and delete, O(loglog n) for decrease-key, and O(1) for all other heap operations, including insert and meld. We also analyze the multipass pairing heap, a variant of pairing heaps. For this heap implementation, we obtain the same bounds except for decrease-key, for which our bound is O(loglog n logloglog n). Our bounds significantly improve the best previously known bounds for all three data structures. For slim and smooth heaps our bounds are tight, since they match lower bounds of Iacono and Ozkan; for multipass pairing heaps our bounds are tight except for decrease-key, which by the lower bounds of Fredman and Iacono and Özkan must take O(loglog n) amortized time if delete-min takes O(log n) time.
READ FULL TEXT
