A Polynomial-time Fragment of Epistemic Probabilistic Argumentation (Technical Report)

11/29/2018
by   Nico Potyka, et al.
0

Probabilistic argumentation allows reasoning about argumentation problems in a way that is well-founded by probability theory. However, in practice, this approach can be severely limited by the fact that probabilities are defined by adding an exponential number of terms. We show that this exponential blowup can be avoided in an interesting fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation and that some computational problems that have been considered intractable can be solved in polynomial time. We give efficient convex programming formulations for these problems and explore how far our fragment can be extended without loosing tractability.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/12/2019

Polynomial-time Updates of Epistemic States in a Fragment of Probabilistic Epistemic Argumentation (Technical Report)

Probabilistic epistemic argumentation allows for reasoning about argumen...
research
09/12/2020

Explainable Automated Reasoning in Law using Probabilistic Epistemic Argumentation

Applying automated reasoning tools for decision support and analysis in ...
research
09/27/2022

Static Knowledge vs. Dynamic Argumentation: A Dual Theory Based on Kripke Semantics

This paper establishes a dual theory about knowledge and argumentation. ...
research
09/01/2022

Probabilistic Deduction: an Approach to Probabilistic Structured Argumentation

This paper introduces Probabilistic Deduction (PD) as an approach to pro...
research
01/02/2012

Technical Note: Exploring Σ^P_2 / Π^P_2-hardness for Argumentation Problems with fixed distance to tractable classes

We study the complexity of reasoning in abstracts argumentation framewor...
research
04/21/2011

Algorithms and Complexity Results for Persuasive Argumentation

The study of arguments as abstract entities and their interaction as int...
research
07/28/2017

Empirical Evaluation of Abstract Argumentation: Supporting the Need for Bipolar and Probabilistic Approaches

In dialogical argumentation it is often assumed that the involved partie...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset