Comparing People with Bibliometrics

07/31/2017
by   Michael J. Kurtz, et al.
0

Bibliometric indicators, citation counts and/or download counts are increasingly being used to inform personnel decisions such as hiring or promotions. These statistics are very often misused. Here we provide a guide to the factors which should be considered when using these so-called quantitative measures to evaluate people. Rules of thumb are given for when begin to use bibliometric measures when comparing otherwise similar candidates.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
08/29/2018

Revisiting Relative Indicators and Provisional Truths

Following discussions in 2010 and 2011, scientometric evaluators have in...
research
01/31/2018

Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?

Altmetrics from Altmetric.com are widely used by publishers and research...
research
06/12/2018

Predicting Citation Counts with a Neural Network

We here describe and present results of a simple neutral network that pr...
research
02/13/2018

Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications?

In this paper, we show that citation counts work better than a random ba...
research
10/24/2017

On the differences between citations and altmetrics: An investigation of factors driving altmetrics vs. citations for Finnish articles

This study examines a range of factors associating with future citation ...
research
07/23/2020

Providing early indication of regional anomalies in COVID19 case counts in England using search engine queries

COVID19 was first reported in England at the end of January 2020, and by...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset